Couple of questions

[Paul Hampson]

Next season will we have the mascot that was meant to happened this season as this could be a great revenue for advertising on the mascot. Home and away it would get the fans going.
Highlights is that gone I've messaged the chap who was doing it and I for one know how much time it takes. But had no reply. I enjoyed the highlights he was doing.  What are the plans for next season for videos and interviews.

[rod]

I would love to see the return of the linnet mascot.......!

[Stamford Linnet]

So many teams in the league have sponsored video highlight channels, which obviously generates income for the club.

Are we being shortsighted as a club and not offering this service? Time taken out aside, surely if the sponsorship was enough someone could be paid for their time.

[Paul Hampson]

I know the time from when I did it and the commitment needed. Wasn't about been paid it's more the equipment required. You need a very good camera look at Saturday they had 2 grand camera and then equipment for video rendering is costly. With the wear and tear on equipment is the problem.
If we had means to cover these costs I know many would consider doing it.

[Stamford Linnet]

Surely Paul its a missed opportunity to drive sponsorship revenue for the club.

I know professional equipment is costly but our Chairman surely can see the benefits of this if there was an increase in sponsorship? Look at Leamington's coverage - professional looking and obviously sponsored.

There has to be a business case here for Mr Cleeve as the equipment would be an asset to the club.