You posted that the new regime were a bit " fag packet " when in reality that would only apply to the accounting inherited from the previous owner along with a complete lack of record keeping.
Also there was a lack of planning from the new owners whereas the opposite is the truth but this will only be judged as the Club move forward with supporters remaining positive rather than look for any opportunity to find fault.
There has been comment on financial restrictions and I think the new owners said that budgets would be set and every effort would be made to stay within those budgets over the financial year. So its quite refreshing that cost savers and efficiency are being taken into account rather than just spending other peoples money before asking for more.
Cleeve in his last days at the Club made reference to other investors being interested in buying the Club however like most things Cleeve ( like the table ) were never likely to ever happen. Also the DCMS loan would make the Club unattractive to most. This loan will be an ongoing issue for years thanks to the previous owner.
And once again Cleeve has gone and continually suggesting that he may still have any ownership is false.