Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mallard

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 84
46
General Discussion / Re: Lynn win
« on: May 03, 2022, 03:52:06 PM »
B&G/Tony. I really hope you are right.  I wonder what odds you would give me on you guys repeating the same thing this time next year.?

Itís the cynic in me but I keep thinking of Spots and Leopards.

47
General Discussion / Re: Lynn win
« on: May 03, 2022, 09:33:04 AM »
Listening to TWís interview sounds like Woking were a team of giants, but we were the better ball players.   The Slippery Nipsters won the day

48
General Discussion / Re: Relegation created last Summer
« on: May 02, 2022, 04:53:56 PM »
25 years seems about right, if itís interest free.

49
General Discussion / Re: Relegation created last Summer
« on: May 02, 2022, 01:52:22 PM »
As Lakey covers  Norfolk Local sport you would  think could have  dedicated more column inches to the exciting Thurlow Nunn Prem title fight.  Gorleston and Wroxham surely deserved some of those inches that Lakey gave  over to Cleeveís ramblings. 

50
General Discussion / Re: Relegation created last Summer
« on: May 02, 2022, 11:19:33 AM »
I seem to recall SC added a quid on the admission for each person that was set aside to pay off that £500k loan.   How much would that equate to this season?

51
General Discussion / Re: Relegation created last Summer
« on: May 02, 2022, 10:10:45 AM »
Good that Lakey mentions the Chairman not being afraid to dip his hand in his pocket, but for balance no mention of the £500k loan heís saddled the Club with

52
General Discussion / Re: Down but not out.
« on: May 01, 2022, 06:47:00 PM »
In fairness to SC in his time at the helm the only people he has asked to invest in the Club is the fans. 

53
General Discussion / Re: Tommy talk
« on: May 01, 2022, 12:38:48 PM »
I thought I read we are staying full time.  I see a few positives in terms of finances for next season.

1. Chairman saying he should be able to stick £200k

2.  Best shirt sponsorship deals in the Clubs history.

3.  New commercial Director onboard with a remote to get a Ground sponsor.

4.  Summer entertainment outside at The Walks ( 4 events).

5.  Gates hitting 1400 if we are successful on the pitch

6. Reduced players/Management wages for playing at a lower level..


If we could also get a decent cup run, Malc and his Fiends making a a decent few quid to inject into the Club. 

That all adds up to some serious money.

54
General Discussion / Re: Down but not out.
« on: May 01, 2022, 08:48:15 AM »
Letís hope the Chairman and the Club in general are more proactive with the fans than has perhaps previously been the case.

SC has a few years experience on what not to do.  Letís hope lessons have been learnt and he comes back a more humble person. 

55
General Discussion / Re: Tommy talk
« on: May 01, 2022, 08:45:03 AM »
Mind Culverhouse took us up as a part time Club.

Millard, do you think he would have still managed to do that if the Pandemic had not put an end to the season?

Who knows.  We were in a poor run of form at the time so the timing of the calling a halt was perfect for Lynn.  It certainly went our way.

We can only deal with facts not what ifís or maybeís.  Yesterday we got relegated.  Collective responsibility.  No good TW trying to push the blame elsewhere.  He was brought in to do a job and failed.

The good thing is next season he has a clean sheet of paper and can be judged on what he achieves then.  He has the chance to redeem himself.

It seems in the Chairmans EDP column he recognise all the mistakes and is preparing to put things right in readiness for next season.  So to that end he also has a clean sheet of paper.

Have to think itís a total rethink for all at the Club.  Letís hope they all get more right than wrong.

56
General Discussion / Re: Tommy talk
« on: April 30, 2022, 08:07:45 PM »
Think both Managers and The Chairman should take equal responsibility.  Easy to deflect the blame elsewhere.   If Tommy gets us back up next season then heís matched what Culverhouse achieved. 

Mind Culverhouse took us up as a part time Club.

57
General Discussion / Re: Cameron King.
« on: April 30, 2022, 07:12:47 PM »
100-125k seems rather low when you factor in.

Advertising Boards
Stadium Sponsorship
Match Sponsors
Ball Sponsors
Stand Sponsors
Player sponsorship
Programme advertising
Clubhouse lettings
Events organised

Plus other ways of raising funds

58
General Discussion / Re: Down but not out.
« on: April 30, 2022, 07:08:40 PM »
Sad day for the Club ?  Maybe.  Though Iím not convinced step one is our level.  The Chairman was more or less saying this in his EDP column today.  Looking at running on crowds of 800 next season doesnít suggest we are going for a massive promotion push.

Very interesting summer in prospect with maybe a lot players leaving and in turn coming in.

59
General Discussion / Re: Cameron King.
« on: April 30, 2022, 02:02:20 PM »
Iím sure I read one of the targets was a stadium sponsor.  That would blow your estimates out of the water B&G.  Didnít someone ( anonymous) sponsor the main stand for £40k this season ?   Surely the Ground Sponsorship would be somewhat more.

60
General Discussion / Re: Cameron King.
« on: April 30, 2022, 06:59:09 AM »
With the remuneration offered for a ĎDirectorí I do wonder what kind of applicant those figures will attract.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 84
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal