Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Nemesis

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31
General Discussion / Re: Club and Community Football.
« on: July 04, 2020, 10:17:29 AM »
and the response from the KLCF Facebook page:

Dear Players, Parents & Supporters
It has come to our attention that King’s Lynn Town Football Club have today issued a statement regarding the links between KLCF and themselves.
We are greatly saddened, disappointed and disheartened at the many untruths and assertions contained within this article.
As many of you will know, King’s Lynn Community Football was set up in 2002 thanks to the assistance of many local agencies, organisations, schools and businesses with grants and support from the Football Foundation, Borough Council and West Norfolk Partnership. KLCF sadly lost its office at the town football club when this went into administration in 2009 and is indebted to the organisations, businesses and Trustees that supported it through this difficult period.
KLCF is a not-for-profit organisation run self-sustainably and independently for the benefit of its users. Charitable status was gained in 2014 and we run several programmes within the local community, schools and college supporting and providing opportunities for children, young people and adults to play sport and football at all levels and ability.
The scheme endeavours to form strong links within football, both with professional and semi-professional clubs locally and further afield. KLCF has in turn acted as a feeder from its own elite and development programmes to these clubs as well as nurturing and supporting coach development. We would hope that our results speak for themselves.
We are saddened by this article on many levels, not least by the impact on our many players we endeavour to provide opportunities for but also for our coaches who have given their time, energy and enthusiasm to supporting the town football club over so very many years.
We would wish King’s Lynn Town Football Club every success with their new venture and hope that we may again enjoy a close working relationship with them at some point in the future.
We would like to thank all our key stakeholders, West Norfolk Schools Sports Partnership, Alive West Norfolk, The College of West Anglia, Double G Clothing, local schools, parents, players, volunteers and employees together with our tireless Trustees for their on-going support and commitment.
We look forward to welcoming back participants to all our sessions; whether in schools, college, football, holiday or partner activities, once it is safe to do so.
Best wishes and stay safe
KLCF

32
General Discussion / Re: Venue cancellation
« on: May 08, 2020, 11:23:00 AM »
and a little bit tactless of Mr Cleeve to take to Twitter to say how well one of his investments is doing.

33
General Discussion / Re: The big vote
« on: May 03, 2020, 12:57:53 PM »
I wonder what Chorley received.

34
General Discussion / Re: Chairman's podcast
« on: April 19, 2020, 07:03:06 PM »
I remember when he advertised the manager's post after Culverhouse left he emphasised that fact that there was no Board to delay decision making.

35
General Discussion / Re: Chairman's podcast
« on: April 19, 2020, 06:00:59 PM »
To quote the KHIST website:
"KHIST 2020 LOTTERY – launched November 2010 – The lottery has now raised over £100,000 for the club, whilst delivering out large cash and other prizes each month to those who take part"

In fairness to SC he is very unlikely to quote parts that do not fit his argument.  I mean who would do that.
Someone who is more interested in scoring cheap political points in order to cause trouble rather than presenting a fair picture.

36
General Discussion / Re: Chairman's podcast
« on: April 19, 2020, 03:14:08 PM »
The KHIST were raising funds for the club. Basically it was just another dig at the Trust but there was no mention that KHIST were shareholders . This was before the Ground Development Fund was started.

37
General Discussion / Re: Chairman's podcast
« on: April 19, 2020, 11:55:09 AM »
I believe in his past programme notes Stephen Cleeve has praised the work of Kidderminster Harriers Independent Supporters' Trust although he didn't seem to mention that they have two members on the KHFC board.

38
General Discussion / Re: The big vote
« on: April 14, 2020, 09:14:41 PM »
Interesting comment on the Havant & Waterlooville website
"If a null and void season is the decision, then all the games will no longer be on the record. Clubs may then need to decide how they handle goal bonuses, clean sheet bonuses already paid for games that cease to exist. This could result in legal argument."

Would a club really want to claim back bonuses?

39
General Discussion / Re: The big vote
« on: April 12, 2020, 02:27:13 PM »
Doesn't it also have to be ratified by the FA Council and we already know they prefer null and void over PPG?

40
General Discussion / Re: All results expunged
« on: April 07, 2020, 09:50:37 AM »
Interesting to read Stephen Cleeves's comparison of possible football season conclusions with the decision to not null and void school exams but take into account performance during the year.
Unfortunately there is also a football comparison, if a match is abandoned it is replayed!
 :stir:  :laughcry:

41
General Discussion / Re: Today’s NLP
« on: April 05, 2020, 09:05:10 PM »
It will be interesting to see what happens if National League clubs prefer one way of ending the current season and the EFL choose another. Will loyalty to member clubs take priority over National League ambitions?

42
General Discussion / Re: All results expunged
« on: April 03, 2020, 11:58:10 AM »
The National League sees itself as an extension of the EFL so will do whatever actions are decided by the leagues above and won't give a thought to individual situations or clubs at Step 3 and below.

43
General Discussion / Re: All results expunged
« on: April 01, 2020, 07:39:15 PM »
Hereford have played 35
Spennymooor have played 18 homes games so Home/Away ppg times 18  to bring everyone to 36

44
General Discussion / Re: All results expunged
« on: April 01, 2020, 06:43:58 PM »
There is no ideal way of dong this.  If we must use PPG and a carry-over to next season then, as some clubs have played more home than away games and vice-versa, you could take the average home PPG and the average away PPG and multiply each by 21 to get an end of season total to be carried forward to next season, but then there would still be some clubs complaining that it was unfair as some of their remaining matches were against lower/higher opposition and therefore their PPG would have improved/diminished had the season continued.
Also, to how many decimal places will PPG be calculated, could promotion be won on one hundredth of a point or should we argue about the merits of rounding?

45
General Discussion / Re: All results expunged
« on: March 31, 2020, 09:45:32 PM »
Nice idea but who would say what fixtures had to be played in order to catch up.
Assuming the target is 36 games, as Hereford have  already played 35, we would have to play one home and two away, but which ones?

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6