Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - MARCUS ROSE

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 15
General Discussion / Re: ground capacity
« on: August 21, 2020, 09:12:21 PM »
With the talk of 30% being the magical figure will 1650 be about right for our gate next season ?

Its the minimum capacity of the league, not the individual clubs, that are being used so far. It appears to be 4000 for the National League.
So 30% will be 1200.  So get your £35 ready.  :countingmoney:

General Discussion / Re: Backroom Staff
« on: August 15, 2020, 09:46:45 PM »
Hmm, perhaps the people who question any "perks" that volunteers may or may not get, should volunteer themselves. Problem solved, everybody happy.  :countingmoney:

General Discussion / Re: Fundraising
« on: August 11, 2020, 09:27:56 PM »
Would it be worth seeing if you can fit in another season ticket raffle before the season kicks off, I would be willing to gamble another tenner? :dontknow:

How about Contacting Mark Hearle to see if the Club would release the first of the new shirts off the production line, with the new sponsor's name.  Then get all the first team squad to sign it and The Trust run a raffle at a Fiver a ticket. 

Iíll even buy the shirt.

Maybe the Chairman could present the shirt to the winner.  Good photo opportunity for the Chairman/Club plus also help toward a reconciliation between SC and The Trust.


Well done Mallard. I'm sure i read somewhere they only cost  £1 to manufacture, so shouldn't be too expensive for you.

General Discussion / Re: Next Season
« on: July 31, 2020, 09:11:40 PM »
Hmm, looks like the "divide & conquer" tactics, re the support base, used by past & present owners is now bearing fruit. 

General Discussion / Re: Awards Ceremony
« on: July 23, 2020, 08:37:36 PM »
Did the Old Bill lay on a dispersal order?  :laughcry:

General Discussion / Re: Champions
« on: July 06, 2020, 09:40:44 PM »
Think if you click on the photo KES you can see that Social distancing has been pushed aside, while the photo is taken.   Difficult to have a group photo while maintaining Social distancing. 

The Lord Napier.... Where the Linnets & their fans drink.,......would make a grab ad in next years Match day Programme  :laughcry:

Just add the photo to the Nap's ad on the Trust website.  Perfect.  :cheers:

General Discussion / Re: Wigan
« on: July 02, 2020, 09:09:00 PM »
Think we can count ourselves lucky that Stephen Cleeve has said he is not prepared to continue to bankroll the club and wants to see it become self sufficient.   I guess thatís why we are getting so many appeals to the fans for funds.


General Discussion / Re: Wigan
« on: July 01, 2020, 08:21:29 PM »
Hasnít there been a couple of takeovers there in recent months from Overseas Investors ?

Only 4 weeks ago, an Asian shareholder increased his shareholding in the Club to 75%, effectively taking over control of the Club.

Club has apparently posted a £9,000,000 loss.

Previous owners sold to current owners citing one of the reasons as being "it was dissatisfied with the loss-making finances of the Championship................".

The current owners have now said something similar, "unsatisfactory financial performance of the club, due to the punishing economics of the Championship..........."

What they mean is,  spent money they never had, trying to keep up with the big boys.  :countingmoney:

General Discussion / Re: The big vote
« on: June 19, 2020, 10:50:46 PM »
I couldnít agree more ,there needs new incentives on how to raise money and new blood is needed to come up with ways of doing it

Over to you Grissles.  :countingmoney:

General Discussion / Re: War Chest appeal.
« on: June 06, 2020, 08:59:05 PM »
People will support the war chest ,only members of trust wonít who would happily see Cleese fail ,I honestly hope trust never get their greedy grubby hands on the club ,Cleese reaches out for support ,trust want shares greed

Do you mean John Cleese AKA Basil Fawlty?   :laughcry:

General Discussion / Re: War Chest appeal.
« on: June 02, 2020, 10:58:46 PM »
If Mr Cleeve wants to copy supporter owned clubs, why not copy one, which last season set a weekly team budget of under £3k. Recruited a squad of hungry young players, who reached 2nd place in their league and turned the clubs finances round. Resulting in a monthly surplus being made, until covid reared its head.  Who's supporters were happy to have a team to watch, with anything else a bonus. Can't see this happening at Lynn can you?

Mentioning Darlington, Gateshead etc is just an attempt to make the appeal for cash, more acceptable to more people.  The figures speak for themselves. Supporters who own, or have a say in the running of their club, are more generous when funds are needed. Take FCUM.  £15k Crowdfunder for pitch improvements, target reached in 2 days, with £32k raised in a month when it ended.
I think the target has been set to high, given that the other appeals since lockdown started, appear to have only reached £5k. There's no harm in asking, but most Linnets have short arms & long pockets.  :countingmoney:

General Discussion / Re: The big vote
« on: May 15, 2020, 10:29:38 PM »
EFL league 2 vote to end season and use unweighted PPG....if that is followed through to National League then Lynn top of North.Has to be consistent treatment in  N ,S and NL, so can see Barrow, Wealdstone and Lynn going up

"consistent treatment" would surely be all leagues voided, like the rest of non league football.

General Discussion / Re: Venue cancellation
« on: May 09, 2020, 10:07:08 PM »
What are everyoneís views on something I saw on Facebook a day or two ago.

So I was going to have a 40th birthday party at King's Lynn Town Football Club but it was obviously cancelled due to government advice. I asked for a refund and was refused,  but offered to rebook in 12 months. I declined as Iím not working at the moment and the money is more important than a party. After Stephen Cleeve the owner acknowledged there was no terms and conditions they still refused a refund. After many emails back and forth and even pointing out that accoarding to the CMA Iím entitled to a full refund, Iím now being ignored, this maybe because theyíre not there but there was no out of office automated email.
Iím not one to name a shame but it is unprofessional and a blatant flouting of consumer rights.
I have attached a link for the advice from the CMA on the website for those of you affected in a similar way.
I also now feel like I have no alternative to report them to the CMA

What are your views? 

"Investors may not get back the capital they invested"   :cheers:

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12 13 ... 15
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal