Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - MARCUS ROSE

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
31
General Discussion / Meanwhile
« on: February 26, 2021, 08:39:53 PM »

32
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 26, 2021, 06:14:12 PM »
See you did nothing after MARCUS ROSE called me a lapdog, deeply offensive.

Sorry to disappoint Realist,. But I was not referring to you. Unless you also post as Loopy Linnet. Also read the disclaimer at the bottom of page.

33
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 26, 2021, 08:15:36 AM »
Some people can't have reasoned debate Mallard. Hence the mud slinging to divert attention from the matter in hand. There's been 10;years of such behaviour, usually when the chips are down. Usually from the same source. I wonder why?

34
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 26, 2021, 07:23:56 AM »
Been sniffing the barmaids apron again Loopy? :cheers:

35
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 25, 2021, 07:59:08 PM »
I would lose respect for the Trust if they gave in to the rabble rousing perpetrated by the Clubs number one lap dog.
True there is a pandemic on which has changed a lot this last year.  But the funds the Trust have are nowhere near
enough to bail the club out, even if the club asked.
A loan would be no good, as Mr Cleeve has stated, the Club does not want to be saddled with another loan.
Mr Cleeve plotted a course of his own choosing, swept along by an expectant public, blowing air into the sails.
Perhaps this same public should now be putting their hands in their pockets.
I believe the Club accounts are due to be filed very soon. I hope the Trust would look at these, before making any knee jerk reactions.

Loopy you still haven't answered the questions.

36
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 25, 2021, 12:33:03 PM »
You  didn't answer the questions Loops.  So I must assume you are spouting hot air as usual.

It's a shame that both owners of this club did not want to embrace  supporter  involvement, aside from handing money over.  As for grants, all providers were aware the Trust had no iofficial nvolvement with the club. Now if previous/present owners had been all for a community club, the grants would have been theirs.

Don't forget to answer the questions. If you know of any financial wrong doings let's hear them.

37
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 25, 2021, 12:06:36 PM »
Always an excuse ,and there you some it right up itís about the trust getting control of the club ,youíre not here to help the club only for the financial gain of the trusts inner circle

Loopy, can you explain who the Trust's inner circle are, and how they gain financially from it?

Failure to come up with any credible answers, would  lead me to believe that you have only come on here, to divert attention from what's happening at the club. 
An all to familiar pattern  since 2010. Would you not agree Loopy.



38
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 25, 2021, 11:01:25 AM »
Now would be a good time for trust to step up and help the club through this unprecedented time you may actually unite the fans as well ,as there plenty looking at the trust only wanting the club for themselves and their purposes ,trust is sitting on large sums money that could help this club through the current situation,why not trust approach club to help you may even get some respect from the many fans who think you only have one agenda of taking over the club ,What is the actual purpose of the money as it seems you have very little intention of helping the club unless you get control of it

Now that's a good post for a change Loopy. Is it all your own work?  :dontknow:

Don't forget Loopy, the Trust is just the legal mechanism required, for the supporters to be able to have s voice, and raise money etc. Why not join the Trust Loops you could find yourself elected Chairman.

39
General Discussion / Re: Culverhouse slams National League.
« on: February 24, 2021, 07:16:29 PM »
The non "elite" leagues are sorted out. Surprising how things pan out, when over-inflated grants are not involved in the decision making.

https://www.thefa.com/news/2021/feb/24/nls-steps-3-6-update-20210224

40
General Discussion / Re: NL hoping to continue?
« on: February 22, 2021, 11:08:09 AM »
Some club's may  have large loans already.  With no leeway  for taking a further loan on.

41
General Discussion / Re: Forward Planning
« on: February 21, 2021, 07:20:02 AM »
Not going to happen Mallard. A proper community club would be about stability, sustainability and community. These would all have an  impact on the playing budget. This would be the opposite of what we have at the Walks now.  Could SC  change course that much? 
If as suggested by IC this week,  SC  doesn't have any income. Then I doubt he would write of his loans to the Club.  These debts would l feel,  would prevent new investors getting involved.  Just  mothball  the club,  furlough all staff and players, and ride the storm out. Just like all those other Non League clubs have been doing for months.

42
General Discussion / Re: Two more games
« on: February 20, 2021, 07:08:52 PM »
In the EDP today Mr Cleeve says

"The National League is a division of haves and have nots Ė it includes a clutch of former league clubs, some of which have received parachute payments after relegation and others, like Wrexham, with wealthy financial backing. Others can finance themselves through their academies.

How do these Academies differ to Kings Lynn's? 

43
General Discussion / Re: NL hoping to continue?
« on: February 19, 2021, 06:19:27 AM »
I guess we will soon know what other Ckubs ( if any others) wonít continue, come Saturday ( or before).

As a Club does it really matter what League we are in come August, as long as we have a club

Exactly, would rather have the club demoted back down to tier 4 than have no club at all.

Don't let SC hear you say that. It's the promised land or bust.

44
General Discussion / Re: Culverhouse in Lynn News
« on: February 19, 2021, 06:17:45 AM »
So is the owner saying Lynn are now a small club again? :dontknow:

45
General Discussion / Re: NL hoping to continue?
« on: February 14, 2021, 08:20:44 PM »
Yes B & G, can obviously see where you are coming from and in most cases would agree...keep the communication lines open with the very people you may be relying on to fill the Stadium later.
However, if I was a Chairman of a club in the NL I would be playing my cards close to the chest....we have seen only recently the type of knee jerk reaction than can emanate from the Board over the initial threats issued to clubs who are unable to fulfill fixtures, then moderated as the number of dissenters increased.

It's not beyond the bounds of possibility that if step 2 nulls and voids, so that grants for continuing the season are not warranted at that step, that a  small  number of grants might be available for struggling NL clubs to save the integrity of the league and enable promotion/relegation with League 2

Now what exactly constitutes a "struggling NL club"? 

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal