Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Loopy,linnet

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
General Discussion / Fans on boards
« on: January 27, 2022, 08:01:08 AM »
Have to agree with Alan Sugar and Simon Jordan no place for fans on the board are these fans who join owners on boards going to contribute to transfers or financing club when itís required

32
General Discussion / Re: Stephen Cleeve - Are You a fan Yes/No
« on: January 26, 2022, 10:31:47 AM »
The owners dream, is not necessarily the locals dream  Please discuss.

It's certainly not mine. Never was.
another happy in UCL

33
General Discussion / Re: Stephen Cleeve - Are You a fan Yes/No
« on: January 26, 2022, 10:30:46 AM »
The owners dream, is not necessarily the locals dream  Please discuss.
your dream Marcus UCL Football

34
General Discussion / Re: Coleman departs
« on: January 25, 2022, 06:22:10 PM »
Knowles to Wisbech on loan looks like a clear out now to weigh in the gold

35
General Discussion / Re: Southend (21st January)
« on: January 22, 2022, 03:16:40 PM »
Penaltyís given against us or ones not given for us is not really looking at the bigger picture.  We have 11 points are 2nd bottom 4 wins from safety having played more games than our rivals.  So this penalty talk of was it ? Wasnít it ? is just deflecting away from the dire straights we find ourselves.
Most sensible post on here whether itís a penalty or not in this game or any other donít change the fact we got no decent striker or can hold onto a lead 3 points lost here another at Bromley where we have led
the big picture is showing that the only success we have had since Cleeve has been here is when he's thrown loads of money at it to buy success.We've not seen any clever management although had lots of b.s.put our way not only by him but the people he has had under him.Now the money isn't being spent reality bites hard.It's going the way lots thought it would.To sign a striker you need real money not fantasy money.Tommy said we haven't got the infrastructure like other clubs in this league.Will Cleeve take notice of him?If so why didnt he take notice of the many supporters who were telling him this since he turned up on our doorstep.
what is it with the obsession of cleeve heís the chairman owner or whatever heís thrown money at it his money If players donít perform it lays at managers feet they train sort tactics pick team not cleeve this manager has brought an extra coach in and 5 players and not one them a striker and we been screaming out for striker for months if I took those 5 wages Iím sure anyone could find a striker ,In all honesty the obsession with cleeve is boring and making people look a bit silly he donít pick train or do the tactics thatís the manager

36
General Discussion / Re: Southend (21st January)
« on: January 22, 2022, 02:36:36 PM »
Penaltyís given against us or ones not given for us is not really looking at the bigger picture.  We have 11 points are 2nd bottom 4 wins from safety having played more games than our rivals.  So this penalty talk of was it ? Wasnít it ? is just deflecting away from the dire straights we find ourselves.
Most sensible post on here whether itís a penalty or not in this game or any other donít change the fact we got no decent striker or can hold onto a lead 3 points lost here another at Bromley where we have led

37
General Discussion / Re: Southend (21st January)
« on: January 21, 2022, 10:58:30 PM »
It helps currently if you are a Linnets supporter to be a masochist...Rumour has that Gold is going to front a Spandau Ballet tribute band.
he might as well as he canít front lynn

38
General Discussion / Re: Southend (21st January)
« on: January 21, 2022, 10:03:28 PM »
Excuses being put across already ,I know which games we need to win REALLY,I would want a team going out on pitch believing they can win every game and as thereís nowt wrong with our strikers is he having a laugh Gold couldnít score in a knocking shop even if I paid for him all Iíve heard from day one is sugar coating crap the 3/4/5 people brought in Iím pretty sure could of paid for a striker ,Iíve heard it all our strikers need feeding the ball 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 we need one who can score the one we got canít even score a penalty

Loopy, I take it you believe that the Chairman has made another mistake when it comes to appointing a Manager.

Why do you think Cleeve appointed TW? He must have seen something that attracted him to him.
  :dontknow:
if he canít see what a thousand fans can see then thereís something drastically wrong Gold is not good enough we need a striker Heís brought his son in a coach and 3 more players and no striker Iím sure all those wages would of got a decent striker

39
General Discussion / Re: Southend (21st January)
« on: January 21, 2022, 06:21:55 PM »
Excuses being put across already ,I know which games we need to win REALLY,I would want a team going out on pitch believing they can win every game and as thereís nowt wrong with our strikers is he having a laugh Gold couldnít score in a knocking shop even if I paid for him all Iíve heard from day one is sugar coating crap the 3/4/5 people brought in Iím pretty sure could of paid for a striker ,Iíve heard it all our strikers need feeding the ball 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 we need one who can score the one we got canít even score a penalty

40
General Discussion / Re: Incoming
« on: January 20, 2022, 04:57:16 PM »
Well done another injury prone player and  yet again not a striker is Lynn becoming a rehabilitation clinic

41
General Discussion / Re: Striker
« on: January 19, 2022, 02:16:10 PM »
The Chairman said in one of his podcasts ( whatever happened to those ?) that there was plethora of ex League players floating about out there who would come for £400 a week.  Now was that just wishful thinking on his part ?

Have we ever considered that the reason Tommy hasnít signed a striker is that he lacks the connections ?  So far he has brought in a left back ( Denton is now back fit), his boy from step 3 ( I bet no one saw that coming). Plus two coaches. 

Sorry to say but it all feels a little underwhelming.  Next two games look very significant in the both the Clubs and Tommyís future.

Did TW do a pre or post match interview for the Tonbridge game ?

Do you think there's a chance he was the unseen force behind the Barrett signing?

... and also the Walker loan deal earlier in the year by the looks of it

https://www.kltown.co.uk/2022/01/19/lynn-make-double-swoop/

based on the one game I have seen him play, Scott looks a reasonably signing but I have no idea why Walker is back at the Walks, of all the loanees we have had this season he has probably looked the least interested to be at the club, no doubt TW will blame the system he was playing in or the instructions he was under so look forward to seeing how much better he looks under TW.  That is now four signings in addition to some of the longer term injury returnees so at what point does TW start to trim that number?  Maybe we will see a change in formation that better suits the new personnel but have to seriously question whether the likes of Altintop, Iontton (still injured?), Sundire, Knowles or Charles will make a match day squad now
maybe 2 wages could been spent on a striker along with the extra coaches wages and managers son we could got Rooney out retirement

42
General Discussion / Re: New Permanent Deals
« on: January 19, 2022, 02:13:46 PM »
One goal scorer would be better than 2 who canít score

43
General Discussion / Re: Stephen Cleeve - Are You a fan Yes/No
« on: January 19, 2022, 02:12:38 PM »
Nothing wrong with cleeve heís got the club to the highest itís been heís chucked his money at it just a shame managers canít Chuck it on the right players to win games ,cleeve has his faults no different to anyone else

44
General Discussion / Re: F.A.Trophy
« on: January 19, 2022, 02:08:58 PM »
Losing to Tonbridge could be a blessing I disguise, maybe there is a positive there.
With the current forward line it is unlikely that we will win enough games to stay up. Without wishing to disrespect Tonbridge, we weren't good enough to beat them, a team struggling one league lower.
If SC and TW King's Lynn to be a National League side next season, then they need to bring in at least one forward. It may cost, but what would be the cost of relegation. This is a level that we may not get to play in again anytime soon, so the ball is in their court. If a forward isn't brought in real soon, then we know what their answer is.

I think it would be unreasonable to assume that the club could afford a forward who could rescue the season from this point so maybe that is 'the answer' that it isn't worth yet another financial gamble to retain NL status on top of the debt we have accumulated financially doping our way into the NL in the first place.  You ask what the cost of relegation may be but what is the cost of retaining our NL place, what would change financially for the club not to need a massive cash injection for what, in all likelihood, would be another relegation battle?
offload the rubbish the money spent on an extra coach could of been put towards a goal scorer we didnít need a new fullback or a daddies boy we need a goal scorer someone who can win us a game letís not beat about the bush lynn are in trouble and going down and club chucking money on new players IMO who not going to get us out this mess

45
General Discussion / Striker
« on: January 16, 2022, 08:58:45 AM »
What is 2 managers canít see that every fan has seen all season we need a striker culverhouse brought countless players not a goal getter now new manager brings 2 coaches his son a defender when every lynn fan has been shouting for a striker ,Instead of talking a good game go get a striker and stop sugar coating sxxx or 100 per cent lynn getting relegated  :banghead; :banghead; :banghead; :banghead; :banghead; :banghead;

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal