I would think that "doing a great job" should be judged by the overall condition of a Club.

Surely there's far more to it than just judging things by the level a club is playing at, and it's current league position.   

There's obviously some positive changes going on. Presumably that's down to Bal.

Yet still we are being kept in the dark. We know Bal is here, we can see what he's doing, he talks to people at the ground on match day, but unless I've missed it, there's been no official announcement to him actually being an official at the Club.

So call out to Bal. People are impressed with what you are doing, presumably still with restrictions. If you can't answer any questions when it comes to Joe and his financial dealings with the Club, can you please tell us what the status is regarding yourself?

You must have realised by now how the clubs customers don't like being kept in the dark. They want to be treated the way supporters should be. You've previously been involved with a Club that involves it supporters and you know the benefit that brings.

So, can you please give us an update on your situation and involvement at the Club (ie your official involvement). Hopefully the same question regarding Joe will be answered shortly after. Are you officially here and on the payroll? If not, what's the hold up?

Hopefully any information you are kind enough to give us won't just be a standard "I haven't reported anything as there's been nothing to report".

We've heard nothing but good about you. Hopefully you will agree that communication is of the utmost of importance.

I just wondered whether supporters at bigger clubs ie MU Arsenal etc have supporters so disgruntled or feel that they are just customers!

FC United of Manchester. 

There’s a decent article in the EDP today by Adam.

Nice to see the Club using the space to talk football.

 

  If as some want local footballers then the club will go backwards and attendances also as with Setchells time. SC’s ambition is imho too high a peak to climb without higher attendances and more financial inputs.
 I feel that with the correct model we could have a good team playing at this level when comparing our rivals attendance figures without putting the club in jeopardy financially.
Perhaps with the release of the football structure and management with implementation under the appointed commissioner changes will be enforced that may improve things.

What's the correct model?

Apparently we already have the highest level of sponsorship and commercial revenue that the club has ever had, and that does not appear to be anywhere near enough to fund the running of the club.

As for threatening libel for asking questions (elsewhere not from yourself), this forum never fails to amaze.

Its not really the forum!

Shouldn't that read ......................."some people on this forum never fails to amaze".   

I overheard someone say "This town doesn't deserve a football club". I can certainly sympathise with that statement

I disagree with that.

Of course the Town deserves a football Club, although I think it should be more of a case of what kind of Club the supporters really want.

I think its quite obvious now that the majority of the Town does not care for the dream that some have of league football, but that's different than not deserving a Club.

For a very few supporters its the ambition of playing at a level that the Club can't afford (as long as someone else pays for it).

For others it an ambition to have a Club that really is part of the community, plays at a level it can afford, and not to keep repeating these boom or bust scenario's.

And for the majority, they don't give a sh*t as long as they can watch 90 minutes on a Saturday afternoon (at whatever the level the Club is at) without putting their hands in their pockets other than for the entrance fee.

They then head off home and wait for the next home game.