Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KES80

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 44
16
General Discussion / Re: Fixtures
« on: September 10, 2020, 11:31:46 AM »
Yes agreed.....probably the way forward for the next few months.

17
General Discussion / Re: Royston away
« on: September 05, 2020, 06:04:49 PM »
Great to see a strong showing from Southwell and Loza with both on the scoresheet...bodes well.

18
General Discussion / Re: Live Stream v Norwich U23s
« on: September 05, 2020, 08:33:42 AM »
Thing is tho Mall, the Gvnmt rules are so sketchy and inconsistent that many industries are finding 'ways' to get round so called rules.
I think a football club could justifiably argue that a number of volunteers are required in the ground to make it all work.
If it means those that help out on a regular basis in that regard, get in to watch the game, then I personally don't have a problem with that.
I certainly wouldn't lay the blame at any club's door.......as one Independent journalist put it earlier in the week, the Cummings regime has ousted all the Astronauts just leaving a large number of inept chimpanzees to make up the "rules".

19
General Discussion / Re: Live Stream v Norwich U23s
« on: September 02, 2020, 01:31:00 PM »
Will presumably mean a change in style of play with no hold up man, so keeping ball on the deck and using out and out pace.
Street,Barrows, McAuley, Smith, Brown, Jarvis/Richards, Clunan/Kelly, King, Loza,Henderson, Power/Southwell Subs Southwell/Power, Hawkins, Jarvis, Clunan/Kelly,Jarvis/Richards, Carey, Fleming, Jones, Mair

Still looks pretty strong to me and emphasises the need for having the squad numbers present.
Don't personally think the loan mkt an option.......if the squad players aren't good enough when a couple are out then there's no point in having them.

Suppose Jarv could play the Gash role if required (?)

20
General Discussion / Re: Live Stream v Norwich U23s
« on: September 02, 2020, 10:01:32 AM »
Think it might be a blessing in disguise if Mazza and Gashy are not quite ready for the opening couple of games.......we really need game time for the other forwards and we really need one or two to be given the opportunity and to step up to the plate once given the responsibility.
I can't see Gashy doing 90 minutes every week at this level and there has been an over reliance on Mazza in the past....the likes of Hawkins, Loza , Southwell, Power and Henderson need to find a combo that clicks and is effective when the current "Big Two are out of action.

21
General Discussion / Re: Next season's squad
« on: August 24, 2020, 07:49:34 PM »
So after a lot of head scratching :
Street,
Barrow, McAuley, Smith/MacFadden, Brown,
Richards/Clunan/Jarvis, King, Henderson,
Loza, Gash, Marriott
Subs Mair, Jones, Smith/MacFadden,Richards or Clunan or Jarvis,
Southwell, Power


Which leaves Kelly, Hawkins, Carey and Fleming in reserve.

22
General Discussion / Re: ground capacity
« on: August 21, 2020, 02:57:12 PM »
I think it likely that away fans will be banned till the new year

23
General Discussion / Re: Linnets membership scheme.
« on: August 21, 2020, 02:54:31 PM »
But with only 30% of capacity permitted to attend at least you would be assured of getting a ticket.   Has to have a value


Be interesting to see the take up.
There is a clamour every season for season tickets at Carrow Road because of  the scarcity of match day tickets...which season ticket holders also often have first dibs on fortheir family and friends..
If Lynn' s attendance is limited to 1500-1600 withno away support, will there be afrenzy over the remaining tickets ?

For me, atravelling fan so no alcohol on match day, already have my Lynn scarf, who manages  6-8 home games at most.per season, the £35 scheme doesn't appeal, but then it isn't aimed at the likes of me anyway. But looking at it for more regular attendees, I still don't see it as a well balanced scheme.

24
General Discussion / Re: Linnets membership scheme.
« on: August 20, 2020, 09:28:52 PM »
To me itís more about the priority match day ticket thatís meant to be the selling point


Well if that's the case Mall all it would be doing is increasing the cost of a match day ticket by £1-1.50 !

25
General Discussion / Re: Linnets membership scheme.
« on: August 20, 2020, 03:58:54 PM »
Think they would get a much better take up if they threw in a mask, or a badge in as part of the deal.. .. they do need to get into a mentality of giving something to get something IMO.
 10% off a beer x 20 home games might be worth £8, 10% of some merchandise might be another fiver......still not enough to incentivise me to shell out £35 personally.

26
General Discussion / Re: Fixtures.......
« on: August 15, 2020, 04:00:28 PM »
Already done for NL....if season has been 75% completed, then PPG....... presumably if less than 75%, then null and void

27
General Discussion / Standard at the Top
« on: August 15, 2020, 02:33:52 PM »
https://youtu.be/XQt--zzcIYI


Quite a pacey game and a good watch !

28
General Discussion / Re: New sponsor
« on: August 13, 2020, 09:57:30 AM »
Like you, tend not to gamble further than a Trust raffle...think LVbet might be  a NL sponsor rather than a specific club one

29
General Discussion / Re: Fixtures.......
« on: August 10, 2020, 09:23:13 AM »
Still worth a tenner for the ground improvement fund/season ticket draw. :scarf:



With match day tickets being restricted, a nice way to ensure you get to be there !

30
General Discussion / Re: Fixtures.......
« on: August 10, 2020, 08:34:23 AM »
1300-1400 would be a decent starting point, if it can be 40/50% later on, that's 2000-2500.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 44