Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KES80

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 52
691
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 29, 2019, 09:37:41 PM »
Yes, not much between them and could have gone either way.I am more familiar with Jones, so I guess that's probably why I feel more comfortable that way round.

692
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 29, 2019, 09:14:39 PM »
For away at Guiseley I would go for :
Street, Jones, Fryatt , McAuley, Smith, Fox,
Jarvis, Richards, Henderson, Marriot, Gash
Subs Barrows, Clunan, Kelly, Hawkins, Carey


For at home to Kettering, I would go:
Street, Jones, Fryatt, McAuley, Fox, Jarvis, Clunan, Henderson, Kelly, Marriott,Gash
subs Barrows, Smith, Richards, Hawkins, Carey



From earlier in thread guys.

693
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 29, 2019, 09:08:31 PM »
Hi Mallard, Hi Tony.
Yes very much about individual views isn't it...makes for some good in depth discussion. I have already posted my line ups earlier in the thread. I favour a tight line up for Guiseley, not dissimilar to yours but would play Richards instead of Clunan...I feel that gives us more bite and zest and possibly abetter chance of snuffing out the counter.
For the homes games against all but the best teams in the league ,I would revert back to the Diamond with Clunan orchestrating things.
The way the squad is, full of midfielders and attacking options and pace, I would be surprised if three at the back is a constant feature....otherwise I can see a gradual exodus of midfielders who don't get game time. If 3 at the back were to become a regular feature I would also question what role in the side Jarvis might have ?

694
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 29, 2019, 04:03:46 PM »
Certainly got too many attacking midfielders if we play that line up. Looks short of pace to me down the spine...pace to burn on the bench.

695
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 27, 2019, 06:04:58 PM »
Obviously limited info about lineups and systems today...good to keep oppositions guessing. As fas as I can tell, today's starting line up was Street Jones, Fryatt, McAuley,Fox, Jarvis, Clunan,Richards,  Kelly            Gash, Marriott.
Subs Carey Hawkins Stewart all used and Smith unused

But I could be wrong...teamsheet and numbering necessarily unclear at this stageI guess ?!

696
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 27, 2019, 02:21:12 PM »
For away at Guiseley I would go for :
Street, Jones, Fryatt , McAuley, Smith, Fox,
Jarvis, Richards, Henderson, Marriot, Gash
Subs Barrows, Clunan, Kelly, Hawkins, Carey


For at home to Kettering, I would go:
Street, Jones, Fryatt, McAuley, Fox, Jarvis, Clunan, Henderson, Kelly, Marriott,Gash
subs Barrows, Smith, Richards, Hawkins, Carey

697
General Discussion / Re: Dream Team for 2019/20
« on: July 27, 2019, 02:03:54 PM »
I would have to have Richards in my15/16.....maybe even starting, for his energy and tenacity.

698
General Discussion / Re: Next season's squad ?
« on: July 25, 2019, 09:11:59 AM »
Hi Tony,
One thing we completely agree on is that the start will really be important and set the tone.

699
General Discussion / Re: Next season's squad ?
« on: July 24, 2019, 10:08:14 PM »
Well football is a game of opinions isn't it ?

Just for the record (not that it means much cos I C will make the decisions), but I find myself unable to agree with much of your post Tony .......for example don't see having a three as being our most attacking option and would have thought the system the squad is currently most comfortable with, will serve them best early doors WHEN it is possible to use it. As I have said before defensive cover is a concern against the best teams and I C appears concerned about the "transition"/counter as it keeps being mentioned, implying to me that he is looking for the midfield to cover more quickly.....if you are playing wing backs and encouraging them to bomb up the field, expecting them to turn in an instance and bomb back is unrealistic, so that must fall on other people's shoulders...if there are only 2 in the middle then to my way of thinking the system doesn't work....hence why I believe IC will use the diamond some of the time and a three in other matches.
I also feel we will see the preferred Guiseley starting line up v Braintree, but many will be rested for Charlton..........the fixtures in August are so tough in terms of number........Sat,Tues, most weeks.

Re the striker...I put that as a question mark, partly in response to Mallard's post, where he suggests it..... Limb and Stewart have a chance to stake a claim this year....if they don't make the grade this season, they could be loaned out and someone else brought in. I personally don't think Hilliard is the answer long term, but since IC has said he is likely to bring one more in, I think it unlikely we would bring a really experienced striker in at this stage and loan out Limb and Stewart, without giving them a go.....so ....?

Btw I do see Lynn in the top8....just.

700
General Discussion / Re: Next season's squad ?
« on: July 24, 2019, 02:49:52 PM »
If we play 3 4 1 2,  I would think it would be in games against the top 5 eg York away. With such a formation you have Jones, Clunan, Richards, Carey, Jarvis and Henderson all fighting for 2 spots and Henderson, Richards, Carey, Hawkins and Kelly for the place behind the front two.
Against the likes of Farsley, Curzon, Guiseley, Gloucester,Leamington, Kettering I hope we go with the old diamond formation, certainly at home.
In terms of a back up striker we have Stewart and Limb in the squad and Hendo and Hawkins might also perform that role.
This is the year for Limb or Stewart to make a break through.
Given the defence now has decent cover and the midfield is bulging, a striker might be the final signing......?
Certainly will be a season where most if not all of the squad, play their part at some stage.

701
General Discussion / Re: Next season's squad ?
« on: July 24, 2019, 02:29:55 PM »
On the highlights on KLTV attendance given as 252

702
General Discussion / Re: Chris Smith signs
« on: July 19, 2019, 06:44:34 PM »
Just the ticket, big, strong, quick, has played at a high level and has a point to prove.

703
General Discussion / Re: New kit
« on: July 11, 2019, 06:41:47 PM »
That's unfortunate news.... hopefully S C can find a new sponsor before long.

704
General Discussion / Re: It all starts tonight.
« on: July 11, 2019, 08:12:21 AM »
I seeYork and Gateshead had work-outs tonight against Leeds and Middlesbrough respectively - I hope that doesn’t show they have more ambition than us..... ?
:laughcry: :laughcry: :laughcry:

No just more established at this level, better connected and nicely placed geographically for those games.. Guiseley have just played Bradford City and Leamington have played Coventry.. Next year hopefully Lynn will have Peterboro and or a Norwich XI.
A 'big' friendly or two is a useful money spinner before the season starts.

705
General Discussion / Re: It all starts tonight.
« on: July 10, 2019, 02:15:23 PM »
I quite agree Mallard, really the Reserves in its current format isnt much of a route to National League football. Obviously there is a need for a Lynn based team offering step 6 football for the local young men of the town and surrounds...as I say I think the current reserves may morph into a different name and set up after this coming season.

Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 52