Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Non League

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
16
General Discussion / Re: Two more in
« on: March 23, 2021, 01:06:56 PM »
On Carey, he was in the Dilly team when others were calling for him to be loaned out to “learn the game”, whatever that means.  BUT, I do think he’d be better off playing NL for another year, rather than a bit pert player higher up.

Personally think he should be all over that move to a Pro club, training every day, with better facilities/coaches/players. Even if it's for 6 months before he's loaned out to see what improvements have been made, beats playing for King's Lynn another season.

17
General Discussion / Re: Did We Play Last Night
« on: March 17, 2021, 12:50:16 PM »
Dread to think how much the club will spend on wages for a keeper to come in next season, when Pedro would be more than capable of doing a job on quite low wages compared to the other 'stars'.

18
General Discussion / Re: Lost 1-0
« on: March 14, 2021, 01:46:35 PM »
I echo the thoughts on Marriott not being here next season. Spending £1k+ a week on him, when that could be spread across two players next season is a no brainer. There will also be a big pool of players available next season due to teams trimming down squads higher above, so with more players available, wage demands won't be as high.

19
General Discussion / Re: Substitutes
« on: March 14, 2021, 01:41:27 PM »
Agree a few of the younger players should be giving a chance. There's good evidence of players over the years who may not have been great at a lower level, but actually excel at a higher level when giving the chance. I'm sure when Rashford burst onto the scene, it was said within Man Utd that he wasn't actually rated the best of the youngsters, but was giving a chance, excelled and rest is history. Got his chance because they were short on numbers, and same could happen here. There's no relegation, so experiment. Could turn out that one or two players could be good squad players next season, which means more could be spent on some top player for first XI.

At the moment, club is not only tossing away money, but also a free swing to see who can play at this level moving forward.

20
General Discussion / Re: Wealdstone away Tuesday
« on: March 10, 2021, 12:24:36 PM »
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, the money outlaid on this squad for the returns this season has been shocking. Keeping large part of last seasons squad, and adding 2-3 and club would be no worse off.

Really has been money thrown away. Serious pressure next season to improve, otherwise relegation with what I'd expect an even bigger wage bill (because lets face it, it's not going to go down if they want to 'compete'), the club will be in a very bad place come NLN in 2022-23.

21
General Discussion / Re: Boreham Wood
« on: March 09, 2021, 02:23:11 PM »
I've been informed that the club has taken a substantial loan, repayable over many years.

22
General Discussion / Re: Wealdstone away Tuesday
« on: March 09, 2021, 11:23:08 AM »
After tonight, 6 of the next 8 are against the big boys. Probably expect the message to come out later this week, start of next that club can't afford to continue, again.

23
General Discussion / Re: Woking away Saturday
« on: March 06, 2021, 06:06:59 PM »
Personally can't see any relegation, at worse Dover will be kicked out then there's 2 spots to fill which can go to the weird small promotion league that's created (if it happens).

24
General Discussion / Re: Notts Co away. Tuesday
« on: March 02, 2021, 10:44:07 AM »
Squad will be quite the same, probably just less on numbers because I guess any 'new' free signings would be either not signed yet, or not registered in time.

25
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 25, 2021, 03:19:38 PM »
If King's Lynn stay at this level for next 5 seasons, what is the trusts plan? Just not support? And wait till it goes bang so they can take control?

26
General Discussion / Re: Trust
« on: February 25, 2021, 11:53:04 AM »
Surprised the trust just don't form their own club. Seems like that would be what they'd prefer, but actually don't want the hassle of running a club.

27
General Discussion / Re: Wealdstone
« on: February 23, 2021, 09:15:26 AM »
Option 2 all day.

I only suspect King's Lynn haven't furloughed anyone because it's two home games they should be winning with their squad. Get those wins than furlough. If they fail to win, it's proper pathetic from them and probably like another £20k+ thrown away with nothing to show.

28
General Discussion / Re: NL hoping to continue?
« on: February 19, 2021, 01:48:08 PM »
None of that is going to work....you can't have teams suddenly fielding understrength sides.... all the integrity of the league just disappears.

The solution is fairly obvious and SC has already suggested it....will probably take the NL an age to figure it out. You let the 7 clubs that voted to null and void stop for the season. You organise a mini league or knockout competition between the other 13. Top two or finalists go up to league 2.

Similarly, there is a vacant spot in the NL due to Macclesfield's demise. Let those that want to play on in step 2 have a knockout competition.......winner gets promoted to NL.
Something there for everyone...job done.......move on.

That just won't happen, as it would mean results going from the games against the 7 which the top sides that have something to lose from that won't accept, and league starting fresh with 13 teams, again something the teams with an advantage don't want. Then you have the fact it won't be in league rules and you can't just suddenly change the competition format.

The three options are, 1) stop playing all together. That could have big consequences because league could fine for not playing each game and eventually kick from the league. 2) One I mentioned about still playing but with basically largely youth/non furloughed/free players. 3), Continue as normal, racking up the debts or taking the loan on.

29
General Discussion / Re: NL hoping to continue?
« on: February 19, 2021, 11:14:29 AM »
Not sure what is IC contract, as it's full time, but you can part time furlough staff. Since there's essentially going to be games basically Sat/Wed for rest of season near enough, I'd part time furlough him so he's managing just the Saturday/Midweek games, no training.

Furlough the whole squad that you can, leaves what McFadden, Kiwoyma, Denton and Gyasi available? Fill rest of the team up of the Youth Development, and bring in players (if they're available at no fee, and happy to play for free with just travel expenses covered for midweek/weekend) to make up rest of squad.

There's going to be no relegation as Step 2 is null & void, so don't **** around with clubs future by still paying everyone and trying to finish 20th. Because way season has gone, probably would be bottom 3 even after keeping everyone. So long term protect the club, do that. Worse case, the club is relegated but in a financial better position than if they plough ahead racking up bigger debts just to then only still get relegated or stay up. And approach next season with bigger debts, smaller budget, and get battered as a result before going down.

30
General Discussion / Re: NL hoping to continue?
« on: February 14, 2021, 05:05:17 PM »
Must be looking at around £15k pw wage bill if so, which is mental.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 8
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal