Poster Identity

[somerset linnet]

Just to confirm and I also stated in the past my name is Peter John Farmer. By the way Gordon I believe you where a Queens Scout in the 7th Kings Lynn Scouts.

[Stan]

Firstly, some of us are not hiding behind anything....real names have already been given in the past.

No they haven't

[KES80]

Firstly, some of us are not hiding behind anything....real names have already been given in the past.

No they haven't

"He's behind you"

[Coastal linnet]

Looking for a post about football!!
Can anyone help me ?

[Stan]

Firstly, some of us are not hiding behind anything....real names have already been given in the past.

No they haven't

"He's behind you"

Put your real name on your profile if you have nothing to hide.

[Grissles Oleary]

The St Neots forum insisted on real names before you could join it,I was allowed to stay as Grissles because everybody knew who I was,it would have been too confusing using my real name.

[KES80]

Firstly, some of us are not hiding behind anything....real names have already been given in the past.

No they haven't

"He's behind you"

Put your real name on your profile if you have nothing to hide.

You can't let it drop, can you Stan...dear o dear...this thread had run it's course ages ago.
IMO you are the one who should come clean......why don't you admit to yourself , as much as to others, that this thread is about you not being able to win the argument on any given thread, because sometimes more than one person disagrees with you and they are prepared to stick to their guns as much as you do...and in the end you feel isolated and can only reconcile it in your own mind by coming up with the notion that those two or three people who disagree with you, can't possibly exist....they must all be one and the same person.
We can all change our  forum names......Mallard can be Paul and KES can be Gary, but when Paul and Gary both disagree with you, what will you do....suggest they are just one person or ask them to change their names again.
The whole thread is nonsense, as many have already hinted.
It is also going around in circles...it's supposed to be about KLFC !

[MARCUS ROSE]

I thought "Stan" was one of the more sensible posters on here, but not anymore after reading the following.

"I also now suspect that a certain poster with two or more profiles has close connections to the trust, which suggests that their posts are more in the line of trust propaganda than actual fan debate. I just think this is dishonest, manipulative and not ultimately in the best democratic interests of the fans".

After the recent good news regarding the Trust & the Club, is "Stan" trying to put a spanner in the works? Is he a plant, peddling someone else's agenda?  Who knows.
Any how, apart from the Blue & Gold Trust website and forum, where else would you expect to find "Trust propaganda"? 

[Stan]

Firstly, some of us are not hiding behind anything....real names have already been given in the past.

No they haven't

"He's behind you"

Put your real name on your profile if you have nothing to hide.

You can't let it drop, can you Stan...dear o dear...this thread had run it's course ages ago.
IMO you are the one who should come clean......why don't you admit to yourself , as much as to others, that this thread is about you not being able to win the argument on any given thread, because sometimes more than one person disagrees with you and they are prepared to stick to their guns as much as you do...and in the end you feel isolated and can only reconcile it in your own mind by coming up with the notion that those two or three people who disagree with you, can't possibly exist....they must all be one and the same person.
We can all change our  forum names......Mallard can be Paul and KES can be Gary, but when Paul and Gary both disagree with you, what will you do....suggest they are just one person or ask them to change their names again.
The whole thread is nonsense, as many have already hinted.
It is also going around in circles...it's supposed to be about KLFC !

A lot of words but you are still unable to prove that you are not Mallard and vice versa.

[Stan]

I thought "Stan" was one of the more sensible posters on here, but not anymore after reading the following.

"I also now suspect that a certain poster with two or more profiles has close connections to the trust, which suggests that their posts are more in the line of trust propaganda than actual fan debate. I just think this is dishonest, manipulative and not ultimately in the best democratic interests of the fans".

After the recent good news regarding the Trust & the Club, is "Stan" trying to put a spanner in the works? Is he a plant, peddling someone else's agenda?  Who knows.
Any how, apart from the Blue & Gold Trust website and forum, where else would you expect to find "Trust propaganda"? 

Some of what you say is fair comment Marcus and the propaganda bit is probably a bit over the top. Going back to my central issue however, I presume that as you post under your own name that you believe that this is the honest way to participate in discussion?

[jesuslinnet]

I presume that as you post under your own name that you believe that this is the honest way to participate in discussion?

Irony?

[KES80]

It's a bit late to back-track now "Stan", just because someone else has found you out.
Remind us all..how long have you been posting on here as "Stan", rather than your real name...how long ?
You see it's not only an absurd argument it's hypocritical.....you suddenly decide it's time to change the forum rules to suit your stance, because the balance of debate isn't as YOU would like and you start making accusations and telling other forum users how they should behave. It's all a bit weird and misguided...I think Marcus may have touched on something very relevant there
Anyway, a lot more words ...and the final ones from me on this thread.

[Stan]

It's a bit late to back-track now "Stan", just because someone else has found you out.
Remind us all..how long have you been posting on here as "Stan", rather than your real name...how long ?
You see it's not only an absurd argument it's hypocritical.....you suddenly decide it's time to change the forum rules to suit your stance, because the balance of debate isn't as YOU would like and you start making accusations and telling other forum users how they should behave. It's all a bit weird and misguided...I think Marcus may have touched on something very relevant there
Anyway, a lot more words ...and the final ones from me on this thread.

Sorry, what did you say your name was? Didn't quite catch it!

[kenny r]

Admin, lock the thread for Gawd's sake.  Ken Rout

[Grissles Oleary]

Admin, lock the thread for Gawd's sake.  Ken Rout

Keep it going,loving seeing Stan squirming,can't wait to have a drink with him, Mallard and Kes in the bar,I will get the first round,It will be cheap because I am actually all of them.