0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
just home and clicked on the internet to read the report, have to say, I have just read the Gateshead report via the link on the live feed, good balanced report and up loaded very quickly (putting KLTFC to shame) only thing I disagreed with was there attendance figure which was given in the 300s, not 1060. All in all credit to Gateshead they made it difficult, but KLTFC showed there class in the end to snatch those 3 points and keep us top of the league.
It does seem like expectation levels have shot through the Clouds. Seems like some not only expect Lynn to win every game but to batter teams into the bargain. Bit of prospective needed. We are a part time club playing against many full time clubs who have much bigger squads and much bigger budgets. This team of ours are turning miracles to be sitting where they are. Full and total support is what is required. Then if it all fills apart at least we can can say we gave it our all and enjoyed the ride.Stan you are right Gateshead got demoted through financial problems not through finishing in the bottom 4 (they were 8th). Steve Watson, the current York City Manager was the man in charge there last season.
I was reading earlier today that York City have sold the naming rights to there new stadium for next season to LNER (London Noth Eastern Railways , I believe), this is obviously good for them financially and a guaranteed income for next season already sorted. This is where the difference in the team behind the team are, we struggle to sell our sponsorship opportunities yet they are already sorting out next season. I realise they are ex league, but they are now in the same league as us, so therefore we need to be trying to pull in more sponsorship. Why, oh why, do KLTFC seem unable to attract sponsors? ( please do not blame the chairman). There are many large companies around West Norfolk, we really do need to keep banging on there doors while we are riding the crest of the wave and sell this football club to them.