Author Topic: V Hornchurch  (Read 4710 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

admin

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2021, 02:46:25 PM »

dillydilly

  • Posts: 423
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2021, 04:35:56 PM »
Except, KES, I didnít say the team should have changed to suit him, or that there was a mismatch.  I just think he had so many defensive p,Ayers in his games that they couldnít move forward with him.  Anyway, Lípool vs Man U ....  Lípool on paper have too many slippery nipsters for MU, at least on paper.  And they have the great Thiago....

KES80

  • Posts: 1132
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #32 on: January 17, 2021, 06:45:25 PM »
 nice diversionary attempt Dilly, but Liverpool v Man Utd irrelevant ..this is a Kings Lynn Forum

KES80

  • Posts: 1132
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2021, 06:49:00 PM »
Once again we appear to differ my friend.

KES80

  • Posts: 1132
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #34 on: January 17, 2021, 07:13:32 PM »
Thanks for highlights Admin....... good to see after time has elapsed....have to say Lynn looking a bit lightweight at times...... especially in one or two areas

macfleetwood1

  • Posts: 332
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #35 on: January 18, 2021, 04:13:06 PM »
Now the dust has settled, i must say how polite Lynn fans are getting, because that performance Saturday was pathetic, there was no passion, quality, drive, good technique , there was nothing.
It looked like we didn't want to be there. And what a brilliant idea to give the 3 subs the first penalties. They  were awful. I cant remember such a feeble attempt to win a football match. Perhaps i should take out the word win, it  was never going to happen.   

Paul47

  • Posts: 653
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #36 on: January 18, 2021, 05:08:47 PM »
Now the dust has settled, i must say how polite Lynn fans are getting, because that performance Saturday was pathetic, there was no passion, quality, drive, good technique , there was nothing.
It looked like we didn't want to be there. And what a brilliant idea to give the 3 subs the first penalties. They  were awful. I cant remember such a feeble attempt to win a football match. Perhaps i should take out the word win, it  was never going to happen.

Don't agree about all the pens - though Marriott hit his ok just a good save by the keeper (who was excellent) Maybe in hindsight too many changes?

Mallard

  • Trusted User
  • Posts: 4171
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #37 on: January 18, 2021, 05:17:27 PM »
Our reward HAD we won on Saturday ...

Maidstone at home

KES80

  • Posts: 1132
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #38 on: January 19, 2021, 02:54:23 PM »
Been drawn at home to Maidstone in the round of 16........ certainly winnable....Lynn could and should have been through to the quarter finals at least

dillydilly

  • Posts: 423
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #39 on: January 19, 2021, 03:13:33 PM »
We had very few players likely to cause them any problems, at least until the subs, who we should have started with.  Hornchurch had all the players, nipsters, and creators.  Still think Sam K and King would shine in a positive line-up.

admin

  • Administrator
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: V Hornchurch
« Reply #40 on: February 06, 2021, 04:59:50 PM »
Hornchurch 5 Maidstone 4

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal