Author Topic: TO BE OR NOT TO BE  (Read 2154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sworn 2 secrets

  • Posts: 390
    • View Profile
TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« on: April 23, 2016, 12:26:13 PM »
The question is are we to be in contention next season or not to be if the first team finances are limited to revenue from attendances only, lots of good things set to take place which can only be good, but we need more people on board and part of club to see how far we really can go.

rod

  • Posts: 1483
    • View Profile
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2016, 12:32:08 PM »
Would this not have been a good game to promote - don't know whether we would be allowed to reduce the ticket price but just to get some new and old comers along to watch a game of football of a decent standard on a nice football watching day??????????????

Linnet1947

  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2016, 12:50:59 PM »
It's a shame that crowds have dropped off in recent seasons.
Just occasionally we have seen signs of potential increases in attendances,
for example on boxing day, but we played badly v Kettering,
and consequently the extra fickle fans were missing from the next game.
Our inconsisteny has costs us in results, crowds and income.

GrahamB

  • Guest
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2016, 01:01:55 PM »
But there are so many positives for next season, who at the end of September would have thought we would end up 9th, the decisions to install GS as General Manager, Backie to bring the Reserves in under the KLTFC banner, the u18's , to cut our carbon footprint and "shop local"  all these decisions been massive pluses and bode well for the future. With all of these the continued backing and commitment from the chairman down all can only be good for the future.Hopefully success on the pitch will bring the crowds back so as far as I am concerned a big well done to Setch and everyone connected with the back room and playing staff and here's to an even better season in August  :scarf:

Linnet1947

  • Posts: 160
    • View Profile
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2016, 01:17:26 PM »
I agree that we have seen a significant improvement on last season,
when we finished far too close to the relegation zone !
Setch has a constant difficult job, in attracting players to the Walks.
Plus having a small squad, injuries, suspensions to contend with.
Over the last 5 years he has done a great job, and we should all
give him our support for the future, where we wait with anticipation
for who's in and who's out !

tazzywazz

  • Posts: 394
    • View Profile
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2016, 01:41:11 PM »
No disrespect to Backie but the decision to bring the reserves back into the club was made by Setch, with all associated with the reserves backing his decision.

sworn 2 secrets

  • Posts: 390
    • View Profile
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2016, 03:58:40 PM »
Cant see much backing from chairman/owner far to busy elswhere and it appears that all income generated by club not coming clubs way ,until this changes we will not go forward at the pace we are capable of.

THE DUKE

  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
Re: TO BE OR NOT TO BE
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2016, 09:43:30 PM »
Discipline was a lot better last season two or three yellow cards and a few red on a regular basis with players banned I dont know if this was a deliberate policy but it worked.