Clunan

[mrzanussi]

I fail to see how Clunan is still with us. Apart from pointing around the pitch, every time he got the ball he either over hit it or passed the wrong way. If I’m seeing what others are not I’d better get to spec savers. When he came off the play seemed to flow better and more chances were taken

[westlynnmike]

I am afraid Michael Clunan is not good enough for this League. Not a nice thing to say about a player who has done us proud getting this high.

[Walks In The Sunshine]

Never mind this league, I personally thought he wasn't good enough for the previous league!!

I spoke to a former player regularly a few months back and asked about Clunan - I was informed that he is highly thought of in the (previous) dressing room, amongst the players as a "good rep" for the players and also helped "sort things out for the players"

I think he will be found wanting in this division - in my opinion Ethan Coleman and Joe Rowley already look better midfielders than Michael Clunan

Who has been a good servant to the club - but I always used to argue, if Clunan was that good, why haven't other clubs come in for him??

[Bluboy]

Thought sundrie came on and was more physical n ball winner looked good

[Dazzarugby65]

  Local lad, but sad to say out of his depth, and he will be found out quickly by the better quality of player at the present level we play at. More beef needed in the middle of the park. 

[KES80]

I didn't attend yesterday Dazza, so can't comment on thegame itself, but I was surprised Sundire didn't start......we need as much power as possible in the midfield and I share your concerns

[Mallard]

Would Clunan being of a slight frame not be classed as a ‘Nipster’ by one member on here ?

[Dazzarugby65]

I didn't attend yesterday Dazza, so can't comment on thegame itself, but I was surprised Sundire didn't start......we need as much power as possible in the midfield and I share your concerns

I also did not attend, so can’t comment on Saturday’s performance, but I can comment on previous showings and felt National North was probably a level too high for Michael, sad to say this about a local lad, but there must be no sentimental thoughts in team and indeed squad members when we are running with such a small squad.

[Coastal linnet]

" can't comment " but you still do !

[LUFC1992KLFC]

I doubt if Ian Culverhouse does sentiment!
He obviously rates Clunan. So do I. He sets the pace and links things together. Sometimes doing the stuff that goes unnoticed so others can go and play.

[Blue_and_Gold]

" can't comment " but you still do !

In fairness to Dazza's comment, he said he can't comment on Saturdays game, which he didn't.

The comments he did make were regarding previous games.

[Mallard]

Football, as always is about opinions.   Some rate Clunan other maybe don’t.   At the end of the day ( comes the night) it’s really only one persons opinion that matters

[TopCat]

Sorry but agree with majority of people on here…He gave away the ball too many times in dangerous areas last year that resulted in goals for the opposition time and time again. He is not good enough IMO..

[Wingwizzard]

Wow after just  1 game we are saying  a player isn't good enough  at this level  as we lost 1-0 .  if we had  won

would you be saying that . Just get behind the team  and enjoy this level

[m a hill]

He’s been a good servant for our team and he had a good game on Saturday but I understand where people are coming from,but please don’t comment on a match you’ve not seen