0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
TW is a good recruiter, but not always a good selector. All the “lowly” teams we have had indifferent or bad results against, particularly in away games, have been for the same reason. A “safety first” selection with too many defenders, no inventive midfielders, and only one real front man. We dominate and play well when we have inventive m/fielders and slick attackers. A selection like that keeps the opponents penned back, gives us more chances, and defends as well by keeping them back trying to cope with us. The worst is when we replace one attacker with another, instead of having both and replacing a defender. All the bad results were with “bottom heavy” teams, and not top heavy. Plenty more games, and we have the players to win it.
Totally agree Dilly, Second in the leagueGames in hand on third and fourthbest goal difference in the league4 defeats all seasonnone at homeAbsolutely disgraceful Tommy should hold his head in shameJust remember where we were last year at this time , there are still 20+ games to go.if you want to question selections take a look at HMS Titanic in BostonTOMMYS PROMOTION CHASING LINNETS
People blaming yesterdays artificial pitch. Do we not train on artificial pitches?
Quote from: Gordon Chilvers on February 05, 2023, 08:11:49 PMPeople blaming yesterdays artificial pitch. Do we not train on artificial pitches?Very true and that’s my thoughts also , we do not look a full time team , Buxton I thought looked a decent outfit , much more up for it than us . I’ll take the criticism but Barrett I feel some games we’re carrying him all hoping for a Peter’sports moment , and like tues night to many hopeful punts down the line leading to nothing , this is where we’re now missing Gold and height upfront for cosgrave/ponts to feed off . Hate being negative but I feel last two games painful to watch and I think we may of been found out . Keep the faith all teams have a bad spell look at Liverpool