0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: dillydilly on August 20, 2023, 04:07:58 PMNo, not scoring for fun, but if it’s the best you have it’s the best chance you have! Equal with their No. 11, Josh was the best player on the pitch. But we do need a regular scorer, and more creative ability in every position, particularly midfield. I don’t think Gold O will set the NL alight, so keep tabs on him. He did score goals in the end…Not only was he by far our leading scorer, he was pretty useful defending set pieces. Those that wanted him gone must be delighted...
No, not scoring for fun, but if it’s the best you have it’s the best chance you have! Equal with their No. 11, Josh was the best player on the pitch. But we do need a regular scorer, and more creative ability in every position, particularly midfield. I don’t think Gold O will set the NL alight, so keep tabs on him. He did score goals in the end…
For me there were both positives and negatives.Player wise. Ronan, Bartley and Spence. Way short of what is needed. Only had to look at Ponch’s frustration at playing along side Bartley. Plus’s on the playing side, of the new lads were Smith, Oke and Clifford. As for the style of play have to admit I had no idea what that was. We didn’t seem capable of stringing anything worthwhile together. It looked a total mess. First half can’t even remember us creating a single half chance let along anything close to having anything on target. Back line looked comfy, midfield, huffed and puffed but looked devoid of ideas. Every deadball delivery failed to beat the first man. What do they actually work on as full timers ?2nd half started more positivity with Barret and Stephens on for Spence and Bartley. We looked lively and on the front foot for 15-20 min, there after we kind of lost the plot again.Once Gloucester took the leads you could see the confidence visibly drain from the players. Luckily we did Nick one right at the death after throwing Coulson up top to try and Salvage something.I know it’s only 4 games into the season but if Hughes sticks with some of what he has invested Cleeve’s money in then that will see us in a relegation battle and probably cost the Irishman his job. I’m not sure if Cleeve has employed another Clark ( he lasted 10 games). I think back to when Cully was in charge at this level and style of Football we played that was so enjoyable on the eye, then look at that today. Miles apart.Crowd of just shy of 1,000 seemed very flat as well. Have to say the Programme was a vast improvement on previous. Interesting article in there from Chris Lakey giving his views on Managers he had interviewed both at Lynn and Norwich. He certainly had Widdrington sussed out.The commercial side looks a worry. No match day sponsor and not one player being sponsored. Be interesting to hear what others made of today’s fayre. Maybe I’m being over harsh. That today will not keep average attendances at 4 figures.
So if we no longer have the money to fund the team to progress where will that leave Cleeve’s ambition of bringing League Football to Kings Lynn. ? Then also what is the point of being full time and paying out for overnight stays if that ambition has now disappeared.Let’s not forget the debt the Club is showing on its accounts. .